There is a structural change in equipoise (boldenone undecylenate) from that of testosterone. There is a slight change in the double bond at the carbon one or two position. This greatly reduces the hormone’s androgenicity and estrogenic nature. It is further attached to the undecylenate ester. It is responsible for controlling the release of hormone once it is administered in the body. The undecylenate ester enables for the peak release in boldenone approximately for 3 – 4 days after the injection, gradually and continuously realizing the hormone to follow for approximately 21 days. Because equipoise holds the similar effect of testosterone at 50 % rate of aromatization takes place in equipoise because of its structural changes. One can witness estrogenic side effects, but things are favorable in an individual as compared to testosterone. Although, you may not find it as a powerful mass builder like testosterone, this supplementation will enable you to gain because of reduced estrogenic activity.

In addition to that, equipoise holds similar properties in terms of direct enhancement with that of testosterone. These properties comprise nitrogen retention in muscles, enhancing protein synthesis, inhibiting glucocorticoid hormones as well as increasing IGF-1 output. Moreover, it is known for enhancing the red blood cell count, which is most commonly found in almost every anabolic steroid. Nevertheless, there has been issues with the amount of equipoise that can increase the red blood cell count. In fact, as per the records this is possible only because of the high dose of the long term of use. In most ways, the increase in the red blood cells that take place because of equipoise can be rapid and high, but it might not showcase any prominent advantage or disadvantage in comparison to the other anabolic steroids when it is used responsibly. Undoubtedly, moderately increasing the cell production can be advantageous for the athletes.

2 Comments

  • Mike

    February 6, 2020 @ 11:30 am

    Many steroid gurus talk of deca, dbol, anavar, anadrol, trenbolone, test, primo, winny, and anti-estros (arimidex, clomid, nolvadex). However, we have not heard much about some of them. So here I am with my question. What you people think of Boldenone/Equipoise? What about Stenox/Halotestin? Besides, what Masteron is?

    Reply
    • Tim Winks

      February 6, 2020 @ 11:30 am

      When you will search them on search engine, you will find it a hit. So, to begin with equipoise is just as “Deca,” except without the effect of Deca that can be possible by a higher dosage of reducing libido. I mainly do not have experience with it. So, cannot advise to have it for cycles. Besides, do not have much reports or so. Moreover, I do not recommend it mainly because Primo do all that it does but not aromatization issues, shorter half life, lesser inhibition, zero risk of gyno (EQ is not that bad but it might show these effects) besides, Equipoise is sold at low ml/mg. therefore, it is inconvenient and is good quality veterinary product besides, there has been a lot bad EQ in the market.

      Coming to the Halotestin which in my opinion is a nasty drug and can be skipped as it is not a good choice for mass gains. Masterone do not exist as of now except for copies, plus it is 17b-hydroxy-1-methyl-5alpha-androstan-3-one. Besides, there is no chance of aromatizing. Hence, it is the best choice for Class I steroid, yet it does not do anything that Primo (or Trenbolone) do not do. Moreover, it was so expensive that when it was available, I don’t have any trace of anyone taking it as a primary anabolic in a cycle.

      Therefore, there are enough of reasons why there is no more discussions about these drugs, though none is an optimal choice.

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *